Image from Google Jackets

The transatlantic allies and the changing Middle East / Philip H. Gordon.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextSeries: Adelphi papers ; no. 322.Publication details: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press for the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1998.Description: 96 p : map ; 24 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 0199223777
  • 9780199223770
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • U162 G66
Online resources:
Contents:
Europe's growing assertiveness in the peace process -- How and why the allies differ on the peace process -- The evolution of transatlantic divergence in the Gulf -- How and why the allies differ over the Gulf -- Coordinating Western policy.
Summary: Since the mid-1990s, US and European attitudes, strategies and policies towards the Middle East have diverged. In the Middle East peace process, Europeans have grown frustrated with the lack of progress and Washington's near-monopoly on diplomatic action, and have begun to demand a greater role. On Iraq, the US insists on Saddam Hussein's military and economic containment, while some Europeans have started to press for a more rapid reintegration of Iraq into the international community and are reluctant to use or threaten force. The issue of how to deal with Iran has been most divisive, with the US threatening to impose economic sanctions on European allies to coerce them into following Washington's harder line. This paper examines the reasons for these potentially damaging differences, assesses the prospects for improving transatlantic cooperation in the region, and suggests approaches that may help bring this about.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Cover image Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Materials specified Vol info URL Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode Item holds Item hold queue priority Course reserves
Books Ghana Armed Forces Command and Staff College General stacks Reference U162 G66 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 2024-0796

Includes bibliographical references.

Europe's growing assertiveness in the peace process -- How and why the allies differ on the peace process -- The evolution of transatlantic divergence in the Gulf -- How and why the allies differ over the Gulf -- Coordinating Western policy.

Since the mid-1990s, US and European attitudes, strategies and policies towards the Middle East have diverged. In the Middle East peace process, Europeans have grown frustrated with the lack of progress and Washington's near-monopoly on diplomatic action, and have begun to demand a greater role. On Iraq, the US insists on Saddam Hussein's military and economic containment, while some Europeans have started to press for a more rapid reintegration of Iraq into the international community and are reluctant to use or threaten force. The issue of how to deal with Iran has been most divisive, with the US threatening to impose economic sanctions on European allies to coerce them into following Washington's harder line. This paper examines the reasons for these potentially damaging differences, assesses the prospects for improving transatlantic cooperation in the region, and suggests approaches that may help bring this about.

Current copyright fee: GBP32.00 2\0. Uk

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share
supported by KAIPTC 
Search Everything in NDU Library →
One search across the catalogue, dissertations and curated open collections.